Do Mandatory Minimum Sentences Deter Crime? What the Evidence Shows
Mandatory minimum sentencing laws — which require judges to impose fixed minimum prison terms for specified offenses — became widespread in the United States beginning in the 1980s, primarily targeting drug offenses and violent crimes. Proponents argued that certainty and length of punishment would deter crime and incapacitate repeat offenders. The empirical evidence accumulated over four decades finds that mandatory minimums have limited deterrent effects and impose substantial social costs, with a growing consensus among economists and criminologists that sentence length is a weak tool for reducing crime compared with increasing the certainty of punishment.